Chanuka: Restoration and Innovation
Based on a sicha by Harav Aharon Lichtenstein zt"l
Based on a sicha by Harav Aharon Lichtenstein zt"l
We tend to perceive the miracle of Chanuka as the restoration of past glory: the success of the Jewish nation in surviving – both physically and spiritually; in preserving its character, and in maintaining its values and its tradition.
This perception is well grounded in one of the central motifs in Chazal’s understanding of the events of Chanuka: the motif of purity. Thus, for example, the whole story of the single cruse of oil centers around the concepts of impurity and purity, and in the “al ha-nissim” addition to the Amida prayer and to Birkat Ha-mazon, we similarly emphasize that the Hasmoneans “purified Your Temple.”
The concept of “purity” (as opposed to the concept of “holiness” – see Ra’avad’s “Sha’ar Ha-Kedusha”) is primarily a negative one: it is the absence of impurity. The miracle of Chanuka follows the same model: it consists essentially of destroying impurity, removing the idol from the
In this sense, Chanuka may be viewed as a festival with a conservative message – whether the physical rehabilitation of the
However, closer examination of the name “Chanuka” and its root (ch-n-k) reveal that its essence is exactly the opposite: it represents not a return or restoration of a previous state, but rather the creation of a new framework and its implementation. For example, among those who are exempt from serving in the army to wage war, the Torah lists “the man who has built a new house but has not yet consecrated it (ve-lo chanakho)” (Devarim 20:5) – i.e., he has not yet begun to live in it (as Rashi explains – “chinukh is an expression of beginning”). The same idea is to be found in the sacrifices offered by the princes of the tribes. When the Mishkan is established, ushering in a new stage and direction in the relationship between God and
This note of newness and renewal, as arising from the etymology of the name “Chanuka,” goes deeper. An example is to be found in Ramban’s answer (at the beginning of parashat Beha’alotekha) to Chazal’s famous question: “Why is the parasha about the menora situated immediately after the consecration of the princes?” He writes:
However, the intention of this narrative is to point to an allusion from this parasha to the consecration by lights which took place in the
And it is for this reason that this parasha (Aharon’s kindling of the menora) appears immediately after the consecration of the altar (through the sacrifices of the princes).
Ramban highlights the parallel between the second Chanuka and the first. This tells us that something of the character of the original consecration (as described in the Torah) is also manifest in the second consecration (Chanuka - at the time of the
To illustrate the two aspects that we have discussed, let us examine a similar event from another festival instituted by the Sages – Purim. Once the terrible threat of annihilation had passed, the Jewish nation seemingly returned to its original situation. However, here too Chazal detect a deeper message in what had happened. As the Gemara teaches (Shabbat 88a):
“And they stood at the foot of the mountain” (Shemot 19:17)… This teaches that the Holy One, blessed be He, held the mountain over them like a cask and said to them: If you accept the Torah, well and good; if not, there you will die. Rabbi Acha bar Yaakov said: This represents a great defense as to the Torah (Rashi: that if God would summon them to judgment – “Why have you not observed that which you took upon yourselves?” – they would be able to answer that they accepted it under duress). Rabba said: Nevertheless, the generation in the days of Achashverosh accepted it anew (Rashi: out of love, in light of the miracle that had been performed for them), as it is written, “They Jews upheld and accepted” (Esther 9:27) – they upheld that which they had previously accepted.
In the miracle of Purim, Chazal detected a re-acceptance of the Torah, with a new dimension of commitment and of self-definition as servants of God. Their acceptance was no longer a coerced, but rather an acceptance of Torah out of absolutely free choice, with new resolve, and with a new dimension of fear of Heaven. This was no longer a “great defense” or “great excuse” concerning the Torah, but rather “the generation accepted it in the days of Achashverosh”: out of love and spiritual empowerment.
The reestablishment of routine that seems to be reflected in the conclusion of the Megilla – “King Achasheverosh placed a tax upon the land and the islands of the sea” (Esther 10:1) – speaks only of Achashverosh’s administration; Kenesset Yisrael, meanwhile, have “upheld and accepted” the covenant. The dubious religious standards evident at the beginning of the Megilla have disappeared. Am Yisrael has undergone a voluntary awakening and strengthening, with a renewed and fresh connection to God, a new perspective and a clear vision the likes of which were unknown to them prior to their encounter with the terrible danger which has now passed.
What happened on Purim on the physical level, happened on Chanuka on the spiritual level. This was not just success in preserving the existing situation, but something more – a new and creative step forward.
This sense of renewal finds expression in three spheres.
First, here too – as in the case of Purim – the experience of facing existential danger left its mark. The possibility of spiritual conquest and destruction brought the Jewish nation to greater depth and intensity in their observance of Torah, lending their Divine service a spirit of renewal and freshness.
However, there was more than an expansion and deepening of what already existed. There was also a real addition and innovation in the sphere of rabbinically-ordained commandments. While the existential foundation of praise and thanks to God certainly does exist within the Written Law, Chazal created their own new entity on Chanuka: a new commandment, with all of the attending details and specifications.
This in itself entails two innovations. One is the actual phenomenon of the creation of a rabbinically-ordained positive commandment; the other is the reinforcement and emphasis of the authority of Chazal in general – representing the basis for other festivals and other commandments. It is apparently no coincidence that the subject of Chanuka candles is where we find the Talmudic wrestling with the idea of reciting the words “and He has commanded us” in the “she-hechiyanu” blessing with regard to commandments ordained not by the Torah but by the rabbis:
Where did He command us [concerning such commandments]?... From [the words], “You shall not turn” [from the sages’ commands] (Devarim 17:11)! (Shabbat 23a)
This aspect of innovation, with respect to rabbinically-ordained commandments, bears significance that transcends by far both the actual introduction of a new commandment and the reinforcement of rabbinical authority. This represents a new dimension to the system of commandments as a whole.
This new dimension finds expression in Chanuka in a third sphere. The Rambam, at the beginning of his Laws of Chanuka (chapter 3), writes:
…Until the God of our fathers had compassion for them and delivered them from the hands [of the Greek kings], and saved them. And the Hasmoneans, the High Priests, grew mighty and they killed them, and they delivered
The Rambam views one of the achievements of Chanuka as being manifest on the political level. His formulation implies that prior to the Hasmonean victory the Israelite monarchy was practically non-existent, and that at that time Am Yisrael received a boost to their political independence.
Thus, the miracle of Chanuka catalyzed a most significant growth spurt, on an unprecedented scale, within Judaism – in terms of development of the Oral Law, in terms of rabbinic exegesis, and in term of legislation. In this sense, what we publicize on Chanuka is not just the miracle that happened, but also the far-reaching growth that it brought in its wake.
(This sicha was delivered at the yeshiva’s mesibat Chanuka, 5760 .)