The Revelation of God's Glory upon the Altar, and the Deaths of Nadav and Avihu
Parshat HaShavua
Yeshivat Har Etzion
This parasha series is dedicated
in memory of Michael Jotkowitz, z"l.
********************************************************
PARASHAT TETZAVEH
*********************************************************
Etzion Foundation
cordially invites you
to attend its Annual Dinner
Rabbi Ari Berman '87
Guest of Honor - Rabbinic Tribute Award
Dr. Mark and Brenda
Gardenswartz - Parents of the Year
Elana Stein '00 and
Tova Warburg Sinensky '00
Alumnae of the Year,
Stella K. Abraham Beit Midrash for Women
Alumni of the
Yeshivat Har Etzion Classes of 1985 and 1986
Tuesday, the 21st
of March 2006
Grand Hyatt Hotel,
NYC
For
reservations call 1212-732-4874 or email [email protected]
*********************************************************
The
Revelation of God's Glory upon the Altar,
and the Deaths of Nadav and Avihu
By Rav
Tamir Granot
Introduction
In this shiur
we will jump between our parasha, Tetzaveh, and Parashat
Shemini. The main part of the shiur
will be devoted to the description of the dedication of the copper altar and
its function. Our investigation of this
subject will hopefully help us to answer some famous questions arising from Parashat
Shemini.
The
question of the significance of the deaths of Nadav and Avihu has disturbed the
commentators throughout the ages. The
main problem is the seeming lack of proportion between the sin and its
punishment. The text tells us that they
"offered a strange fire (eish zara) before God, which He had not
commanded them." No matter how we interpret the word "strange,"
it is clear that they acted improperly.
But their intention seems to have been positive; we are certainly not
talking about one of the cardinal sins, such as idolatry, etc. Nevertheless, they died immediately, in the
sight of the entire nation, in the midst of the dedication of the holy Mishkan.
We shall
attempt to understand this by studying the significance of the eighth day and
what happened on this day, according to the literal text. Clearly, the scope of
this shiur does not allow for a full review of all the different exegetical
approaches; the reader is warmly encouraged to engage in further research.
Part 1 – The Eighth
Day: Presentation of the Problem
(Vayikra
9:1) "And it was, on the eighth day, that Moshe called to Aharon and to
his sons, and to the elders of Israel.
(2) And he said to
Aharon: Take for yourself a young calf for a sin offering, and a ram for a
burnt offering, [both] without blemish, and offer them before God.
(3) And speak to Bnei
Yisrael, saying: Take a goat kid for a sin offering and a calf and a lamb,
both of the first year, both without blemish, for a burnt offering.
(4) And an ox and a ram
as thanksgiving offerings to offer before God, and a meal offering mixed with
oil, FOR TODAY GOD WILL APPEAR TO YOU.
(5) So they took what
Moshe had commanded them, before the Tent of Meeting, and all the congregation
drew near and stood before God.
(6) And Moshe said: This
is what God has commanded you to do, THAT GOD'S GLORY MAY BE REVEALED TO
YOU."
Several
questions arise from these verses; some relate to the chronology of the
establishment of the Mishkan and the command, while others address more
fundamental issues relating to the occasion.
a. The
"eighth day" here is undoubtedly the eighth day following the seven
days of consecration, as discussed as the end of the previous chapter (chapter
8).
Moshe
commands Aharon and his sons and the elders of Israel as to the order of the
Divine service, whose express purpose is the revelation of God's glory. But the
text offers no advance Divine command concerning either the means (the
sacrifices, and the assembly of the nation) or the purpose (the revelation of
God's glory). What is the source of Moshe's command? How does he know that God
is going to be revealed, if he was not told so? The Ramban admittedly comments
(ad loc.) that there are several instances where Moshe commands
something without any textual evidence of a Divine instruction, and we must
assume that he was indeed commanded. But specifically against the background of
the preceding sections concerning the seven days of consecration, in which the
Torah takes pains to describe all that happens, and in light of the fact that
an entire chapter further on in Sefer Shemot (29) is devoted to the
Divine command, why is the eighth day, specifically, uttered by Moshe without a
Divine instruction?
b. What
is the date of this eighth day? In Shemot 40 we read: "On the first
day of the first month you shall set up the Mishkan of the Tent of
Meeting." Was this eighth day the day of the "setting up," or
did the "setting up" take place on the first of the seven days of
consecration? In calendrial terms: are we talking about the 1st of
Nissan or the 8th?
c.
Another difficult question concerns the relationship between what Moshe
promises and the closing verses of Sefer Shemot. There we read:
(Shemot
40:34) "The cloud covered the Tent of Meeting, and God's glory filled the
Mishkan.
(35) And
Moshe could not enter the Tent of Meeting, for the cloud rested upon it, and
God's glory filled the Mishkan.
(36) When
the cloud was lifted from over the Mishkan, Bnei Yisrael would
travel on all their journeys.
(37) And
if the cloud was not lifted, they did not travel until the day when it was
lifted.
(38) For
God's cloud was upon the Mishkan by day, and a fire was in it at night, in the
sight of all the House of Israel, throughout their journeys."
These
verses describe the revelation of God's glory over the Mishkan - immediately
upon Moshe completing its construction and without any connection to the eighth
day. But in our verses we are told that God's glory will be revealed only after
the fulfillment of Moshe's command: "This is what God has commanded that
you do, that God's glory may be revealed to you." What is the relationship
between these two sources? It seems that God's glory already rests in the
Mishkan; what, then, is Moshe promising in chapter 9 of Vayikra beyond
what already exists?
As an
appendix to this last question, we must also consider the timing of the
chapters detailing the various sacrifices, in Vayikra chapters 1-5.
Their heading testifies that they were given from the Tent of Meeting. But if
God's glory only descended to the Mishkan now, in chapter 9, then either those
chapters chronologically came after the Divine command, or God conveyed them to
Moshe before His Presence began to dwell in the Tent of Meeting, or they were
conveyed by means of the pillar of cloud that descended to the entrance of the
Tent of Meeting, etc. In any event, the order of the verses would seem to
suggest that both the Divine command and Moshe's instruction concerning the
sacrifices preceded the eighth day. Thus, we come back to our question: in what
way is the revelation of God's glory as observed by all of Israel, as mentioned
in the closing verse of Sefer Shemot, different from the revelation of
His glory as promised by Moshe on the eighth day?
These
questions, as mentioned, have occupied the commentators, and the reader is
referred to their commentaries on the verses quoted above [1].
We shall attempt
below to address these questions.
Part 2 – Revelation
of God's Glory upon the Mishkan and upon the Altar
Right at
the outset of the command concerning the Mishkan, its ultimate purpose is
defined as having the Divine Presence dwell in it: "Let them make Me a
Sanctuary, and I shall dwell in their midst" (Shemot 25).
Towards
the end of the command, the idea is explained further. In Shemot 29, God
commands Moshe concerning the consecration of the kohanim (i.e.,
training them for their service), and the preparation of the Mishkan by means
of anointing and sanctification:
(1)
"This is what you shall do for them, to sanctify them to minister to
Me…."
At the
end of the chapter, the idea of sanctification is extended to the altar:
(35)
"You shall do thus to Aharon and to his sons, according to all that I have
commanded you; for seven days you shall consecrate them.
(36) And
you shall offer every day an ox for a sin offering for atonement, and you shall
cleanse the altar when you make atonement for it, and you shall anoint it to
sanctify it.
(37) For
seven days you shall make atonement for the altar and sanctify it, and the
altar shall be a holy of holies; anyone who touches the altar shall be
sanctified."
In other
words, there is a correlation between the preparation of the kohanim and
the preparation of the altar; both go on for seven days. This seems logical,
since the essence of the priestly service pertains to the altar; this is their
principal function. The unit immediately following the command about the
consecration discusses the daily sacrifice, followed by some concluding verses:
(38)
"This is what you shall offer upon the altar: two lambs of the first year
each day, continually.
(39) You
shall offer the first lamb in the morning, and the other lamb you shall offer
towards evening.
(40) With
the one lamb you shall bring a tenth measure of flour mixed with a fourth part
of a hin of beaten oil, and a fourth part of a hin of wine for a
libation offering.
(41) And
you shall offer the second lamb towards evening; you shall offer it with the
same meal offering of the morning and its libation offering, for a sweet savor,
an offering by fire to God.
(42) A
continual burnt offering for all your generations at the entrance to the Tent
of Meeting before God, where I will meet you to speak with you.
(43) And
I shall meet there with Bnei Yisrael and it shall be sanctified with My
glory.
(44) And
I shall sanctify the Tent of Meeting and the altar, and Aharon and his sons I
shall sanctify to minister to Me.
(45) And
I shall dwell in the midst of Bnei Yisrael, and I shall be their God.
(46) And
they shall know that I am the Lord their God Who took them out of the land of
Egypt, that I may dwell in their midst; I am the Lord their God."
This
command concerning the daily sacrifice deviates from the thematic framework of Sefer
Shemot as a whole. Sefer Shemot is characterized by the preparations
for construction of the Mishkan, not its content (which is the subject of Sefer
Vayikra). Chapters 6-7 of Sefer Vayikra, dealing with the
sacrifices and uttered (according to the end of chapter 7) at Sinai, are
nevertheless located in Sefer Vayikra because matters related to fixed
sacrifices must logically appear after the setting up of the Mishkan rather
than prior to it. But here, in our verses, the Torah commands us concerning the
daily sacrifice, which is part of the service in the Mishkan after its construction.
As we know, this parasha has a parallel in Sefer Bamidbar,
among the other fixed public sacrifices. Hence, the parasha in chapter
29 of Sefer Shemot is not telling us something that we would otherwise
not know. This makes our question even more pressing: the natural location for
the unit discussing the daily sacrifice is in Sefer Bamidbar, amongst
the list of other sacrifices. Undoubtedly, the command is recorded here for a
particular reason, and not for the sake of conveying the details of the sacrifice.
What is this special reason?
At first
glance it is clear that the command concerning the altar is connected to the
sanctification of the altar discussed at the end of chapter 29. Moreover, the
closing verses also award a special place to the altar. Three entities are to
be sanctified:
- the
Tent of Meeting
- the
altar
- Aharon
and his sons
The altar
has a unique status and importance. It is not difficult to understand why this
is so: even prior to the Mishkan, altars existed. Avraham and Yaakov built
altars; Bnei Yisrael built an altar at the foot of Mount Sinai. The
altar is not necessarily bound up with the Mishkan, nor with the Divine
Presence: "In every place where I cause My Name to be mentioned, I shall
come to you and bless you."
Likewise,
the Mishkan is not necessarily connected to the altar. Its main purpose is
"that I may dwell in their midst"; it is a sort of "house"
for the Divine Presence. We may therefore define these elements as follows:
The altar
serves human needs: We offer sacrifices in order to atone, to give thanks, or
to ask for mercy.
The
Mishkan serves a Divine need, as it were.
The Holy One desired a place to dwell in the physical world.
But the
Torah binds these two entities together. The altar is located facing the entrance
of the Tent of Meeting. We do not sacrifice to God wherever we choose, but only
next to His House; there He receives our sacrifices. The Torah here describes
the dual revelation, upon the altar and in the Mishkan:
(42)
"A BURNT OFFERING FOR ALL YOUR GENERATIONS AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE TENT OF
MEETING BEFORE GOD, where I shall meet with you to speak with you there.
(43) And
I shall meet with Bnei Yisrael there, AND IT SHALL BE SANCTIFIED BY MY
GLORY."
These two
verses, as I see it, bear a simple chiastic structure:
The first
and last arms speak about the altar; thus, the expression. "It shall be
sanctified by My glory," refers to the altar.
The
second and third limb talk about encounter; they refer to the Tent of Meeting
itself. This conclusion arises from the fact that they accompany the
expression, "Tent of Meeting before God."
In other
words, the text is talking about two separate revelations: one in the Tent of
Meeting, the other upon the altar [2].
If we look
further on and try to understand how this Divine promise is realized, we
discover the following:
"The
cloud covered the Tent of Meeting, and God's glory filled the Mishkan.
And Moshe
could not enter the Tent of Meeting, for the cloud rested upon it, and the
cloud of God's glory filled the Mishkan" (Shemot 40:35).
Indeed,
God revealed Himself in the Tent of Meeting. As the Torah tells us, the purpose
of the revelation in the Tent of Meeting is the encounter itself. Still, Moshe
is unable to enter the Tent of Meeting – just as he was not able to ascend
Mount Sinai while the Divine glory rested upon it (see Shemot 24 [3])
until God called to him: "He called to Moshe," as we read at the
beginning of Sefer Vayikra.
But the
revelation of God's glory upon the altar, as promised at the end of chapter 29,
has not yet happened.
This
answers several of the questions that we posed above. Moshe knew that God would
sanctify by His glory the altar, as well. He saw how God had made His Presence
rest upon the Mishkan, and thus he knew that he had to embark on preparations
for the dedication of the altar. The dedication of the altar depends upon God's
initiative – i.e., the appearance of His glory. It seems that the order of the
text should not be changed without compelling reason; thus, the order of events
is as follows:
a. Completion of the
construction of the Mishkan
b. Revelation of God's
glory in the Mishkan (1st of Nissan)
c. Command as to the
sacrifices (which precedes the revelation of God's glory upon the altar, in
order that it will be ready for the service)
d. Consecration
e. The eighth day, and
the revelation of God's glory upon the altar (8th of Nissan) [4].
Moshe
knew, then, that God was going to be revealed at the altar [5]. This is the
answer to our original question: how did Moshe know the purpose and end-result
of the eighth day. The order of the sacrifices, which are brought by his
command on the eighth day, are meant to bring about a revelation of God's glory
[6]. While there were sacrifices that were offered on the altar prior to the
revelation of God's glory on the eighth day, the purpose of these was to
sanctify the altar and prepare it.
Part 3 – What is
God's "Glory"?
Moshe
promises the nation, "God's glory will be revealed to you." God Himself
promises, "It shall be sanctified by My glory." What does this
expression mean?
In a
previous shiur we showed that "God's glory" is His appearance
in the form of fire. The verse teaches, "The appearance of God's glory was
like a consuming fire at the top of the mountain"; we find many similar
expressions. The "glory" is a shining light or fire. We quote here
from our shiur on Beshalach:
"God
is always manifest in fire from within a cloud. The cloud conceals and hides
the fire in its midst. We may assume that the cloud is the result of the waves
of heat and moisture around the fire. This is not necessarily a cloud of water.
It should be remembered that Tanakh offers various expressions in its
description of the cloud: arafel, ashan, etc.
A
striking and relatively clear description is provided in Sefer
Shemot, where the Torah speaks of the Divine glory resting upon Mount Sinai,
and later on the descent of God's glory to dwell in the Mishkan. There is a
clear literary parallel between the two descriptions [6], and they point to one
another. It is therefore worthwhile paying attention to the correspondence
between them:
Shemot
24 – Mount Sinai:
a. "The cloud covered the
mountain"
b. "God's glory dwelled upon Mount
Sinai"
c.
"The cloud covered it for six days"
d. "He called to Moshe on the seventh
day from the midst of the cloud"
e. "The appearance of God's glory was
like a consuming fire at the top of the mountain"
Shemot
30 – Ohel Mo'ed:
a. "The cloud covered the Ohel Mo'ed"
b. "God's glory filled the
Mishkan"
c. "For God's cloud was upon the
Mishkan by day"
d. "He called to Moshe"
e. "And fire was in it by night"
The
parallel is clear: God dwells upon Mount Sinai, the glory of God rests within the
cloud. The expression "the glory of God" means the revelation of the
Divine Presence. Clearly, it has many kinds of functions; in this context, the
main function would seem to be speech. But how is it recognizable to those
witnessing it? The text explains, "Like a CONSUMING fire at the top of the
mountain." In other words, God's glory appears like a fire. The fire is
covered with a cloud. God's glory calls to Moshe – who previously was not able
to approach. In the case of the Ohel Mo'ed, we are told this
explicitly. Why could Moshe not come to the Ohel Mo'ed? "For the
cloud dwelled upon it." What kind of explanation is this? How and why does
the cloud prevent him from approaching? The answer is to be found in the second
part of the verse: "And the glory of God filled the Mishkan." Moshe
is prevented from coming before the glory of God which is fire! The same
message arises from chapter 40: "Fire was in it by night."
Specifically
"in it" – for previously we were told that the cloud was covering,
therefore now the text is explicit; "For the cloud of God was UPON the
Mishkan by day." But His glory "fills the Mishkan" – and
therefore "in it." Clearly, Moshe is not able to enter. For the very
same reason he is prevented from approaching God at Mount Sinai – for the
appearance of God's glory is like a consuming fire. This is an expression
implying threat: "For the Lord your God is a CONSUMING fire, a jealous
God." This is the full description of the revelation, both at Mount Sinai
and in the introduction to the Divine Presence coming to dwell in the Ohel
Mo'ed. The structure is well defined:
God's
glory, appearing as a fire, is revealed with a veil of cloud. The cloud is on
the outside; the fire is on the inside. The cloud is above the Mishkan; the
fire is within it. Hence, the last verse of Sefer Shemot,
describing the revelation of the cloud by day and the fire by night, is
recounted from the perspective of the nation that is watching. From an
objective point of view, the fire (God's glory) and the cloud both remain there
all the time.
Attention
should also be paid to the following parallel:
Shemot
13:
a. "God went before them
b. By day – in a pillar of cloud, to show
them the way
c. And at night – in a pillar of fire, to
make light for them
Shemot
40:
a. "And the cloud covered the Ohel
Mo'ed, and God's glory filled the Mishkan
b. For God's cloud was upon the mishkan –
by day
c. And fire was in it by night."
Thus we
learn that in the same way that God was revealed when Bnei Yisrael left Egypt,
so He was revealed to them on Mount Sinai. And in the very same way He was
revealed in the Ohel Mo'ed. And just as in the two latter
cases His glory was manifest as fire within cloud, so it was in the first case.
Thus, there are not two separate pillars, but rather only one. By day it is
perceived as cloud; by night it looks like fire. And thus the final verse of Sefer
Shemot ends – "in the sight of all of Bnei Yisrael, throughout their
journeys.""
The
significance of the promise, "God's glory shall be revealed to you," is
therefore a precise one: God's fire will be revealed before your eyes. The
Rashbam gives this explanation for the verses which, further on, describe God's
revelation; he adds only one word;
"Moshe
and Aharon entered the Tent of Meeting, and they emerged and blessed the
nation, and God's glory was revealed to all the nation" – the Rashbam
adds: "How?
(24) 'A
fire emerged from before God and consumed the burnt offering and the fats upon
the altar, and when all the nation saw it they shouted and fell upon their
faces.'"
In other
words, the description of the fire emerging is the verse's internal explanation
for what is written previously: "God's glory appeared." I.e., through
the fact that the fire emerged and consumed the burnt offering and the fats,
God's glory was revealed to the people. Then, immediately, "They shouted
and fell upon their faces." The need for an explanation here arises not
because the Torah wants to identify the glory as fire – since this is clearly
understood, as explained above. Rather, the Torah wants to describe the precise
path of the emergence of the fire from before God until the altar; this is what
we learn from this verse that we would not have known otherwise.
In
summary, God's glory (appearing in the form of fire) already dwelled in the
Mishkan, as we are told at the end of Sefer Shemot ("And fire was
in it at night"). Thus, the promise that God would dwell in the Tent of
Meeting had been fulfilled. But God had not yet been revealed upon the altar,
showing that He accepted the offerings of the nation of Israel. Now the
revelation was completed, for fire emerged and came to the altar. The
revelation of the Divine Presence was now disconnected from its esoteric
trappings. The revelation in the Tent of Meeting was by definition, private; it
was reserved for Moshe or Aharon, who were worthy of hearing God's word. The
revelation upon the altar, coming in the wake of sacrifice, is democratic; it
is meant for all and is suited to the spiritual level of the masses.
Part 4: Why Did
Nadav and Avihu Die?
The
question that arises now, as set out at the beginning of the shiur,
assumes that God's fire emerged from heaven and struck specifically at Nadav
and Avihu. Hence, there must been some grievous sin deserving of such a
terrible punishment. Indeed, many commentators seek such a sin and point to
various possibilities. But in light of our understanding of the situation thus
far, and again in light of the Rashbam, we may present a different picture,
such that the question ceases to exist.
Let us
examine the order of the verses describing the revelation, and then add some
explanation, quoting the Rashbam at the appropriate points:
"Aharon
lifted his hands towards the nation and blessed them, and he came down from
offering the sin offering and the burnt offering and the goodwill
offerings."
Aharon
stood upon the altar. In absolute terms, he lifted his hands eastward, towards
the nation, and then descended the ramp southward. (Imagine: the altar in the
middle, facing the entrance to the Tent of Meeting; to the west of it – the
entrance; to the east – the 'ezrat yisrael,' the nation.)
(23)
"And Moshe and Aharon entered the Tent of Meeting, and they emerged, and
blessed the nation."
Moshe and
Aharon together enter the Tent of Meeting – why? "To pray for the descent
of the fire" (Rashbam). In other words, following the mortal service
described above, the time has come for the Holy One to demonstrate His love and
Divine will.
Then they
emerge and bless the nation. In order for the altar not to separate them and
the nation, they must have stood to the east of the altar, facing eastward,
towards the nation, in order to bless them. And then, suddenly, "God's
glory was revealed to all the nation" – to the entire nation, not only
Moshe and Aharon.
(24)
"And fire emerged from before God and consumed the burnt offering and the
fats upon the altar, and when all the nation saw it, they shouted and fell upon
their faces."
The emergence
of the fire happens while Moshe and Aharon are alongside the nation. The fire
emerges from before God – i.e., from the Holy of Holies. This point is of
critical importance. Since God's glory was already present in the Mishkan, we
cannot say that the fire emerged from heaven, as several commentators claim.
The expression "from before God" proves our contention, since this
expression universally refers to the Mishkan, and specifically to the Holy of
Holies. The path taken by the fire, then, was from the Holy of Holies, via the
incense altar (which stood facing the curtain, on the outer side, in the center
of the vestibule), via the entrance, to the sacrificial altar outside. The
direction of movement is HORIZONTAL.
Further
on, the Torah describes the act of Nadav and Avihu:
"The
sons of Aharon, Nadav and Avihu, each took his censer, and they placed fire in
them and placed incense upon it, and offered before God a strange fire which He
had not commanded them."
Nadav and
Avinu take fire in order to sacrifice upon the incense altar. This fire is, of
course, human fire. They do not wait for the Divine fire which is the purpose
of this day and of the entire process. This may be an attempt to "hasten
the end"; a refusal to wait patiently for the Divine revelation. In any
event, the sin arises from the offering of the incense with its fire not in
accordance with God's command. Instead of God revealing Himself, they perform a
human act. What happens now?
"A
fire emerged from before God and consumed them, and they died before God."
The
Rashbam explains: "This is the meaning of, 'a fire emerged' in the first
verse. The two verses are really one and the same. When the fire emerged and
consumed the goodwill offerings upon the external (sacrificial) altar, (and)
when the sons of Aharon took and offered strange fire upon the inner (incense)
altar, then 'a fire emerged from before God' – first to the inner offering of
incense, striking the sons of Aharon there such that they died, and thereafter
it went out from there and came upon the external altar, 'and it consumed the
burnt offerings,' 'and they died before God.' Immediately upon hearing it,
Aharon wanted to put aside the (Divine) service and mourn for his sons."
Therefore
Moshe tells him:
"Moshe
said to Aharon: This is what God spoke about, saying: 'I shall be sanctified
among those who are close to Me, and before the entire nation I shall be
glorified' – and Aharon was silent."
Previously,
in Shemot, we read, "It shall be sanctified by My glory"; now
we read, "I shall be sanctified" instead of "It shall be
sanctified," and "I shall be glorified" instead of "By My
glory." In other words, "Before the entire nation I shall be
glorified" means, "I shall be revealed to them by My fire, which is
My glory" – as explained above.
The
understanding that only one fire emerged – the fire that emerged towards the
altar, striking and killing Nadav and Avihu along the way – changes the picture
entirely. Nadav and Avihu entered in order to offer human fire, failing to
understand that they were thereby affecting the main significance of the event.
What happened to them was a natural result of revelation – which takes the form
of fire. According to what we have said, and on the basis of the Rashbam's
explanation, which sits well with the overall description of the course of
events, as we have presented it, no special fire emerged in order to strike
Nadav and Avihu. They were struck by the very fire that emerged to consume the
burnt offerings and fats upon the altar. Their path must necessarily have
crossed the path of the emerging fire – i.e., the entrance to the Tent of
Meeting and the middle of it. It is logical that they would have been able to
proceed because Moshe and Aharon were on the other side of the altar as they
blessed the people, facing towards them.
THE DEATH
OF NADAV AND AVIHU IS THEREFORE A HORRIFIC ACCIDENT, NOT A PUNISHMENT.
The
accident is not accidental. There is an inherent connection between the cause
of the accident and its result.
The
cause: taking human fire without waiting for God's fire – hence, a
misinterpretation of the occasion.
Result:
God's fire, which they had not expected, consumes them. But in truth, the
relationship between the act and its result is not altogether proportional. Since
this was a "natural" event rather than a punishment, this presents no
problem. A person who falls asleep at the steering wheel and, heaven forefend,
is killed in an accident, does not get what he "deserves." But this
is the natural result of his action.
THERE IS
A GREAT DEGREE OF SIMILARITY BETWEEN WHAT HAPPENS HERE AND THE WARNINGS THAT
PRECEED THE REVELATION AT SINAI. There, too, God was revealed in fire. There,
too, there were repeated warnings against undesirable approaches; "Take
care not to ascend the mountain or to touch its extremity; no hand shall touch
it, for it shall surely be stoned or struck…." What this means is not that
God will punish whomever approaches, but rather that this represents danger,
and anyone who approaches a place of danger may be hurt.
THE
RELIGIOUS SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS SHOCKING ACCIDENT IS RELATED TO THE PRINCIPLE OF
"AWE OF GOD," WHICH ALSO TAKES US BACK TO THE REVELATION AT SINAI.
Closeness to God is joyous but also terrifying and awesome. It must be clear
that a person who draws close to the Divine Presence, but is not ready for or
worthy of it, will be harmed: "Speak to Aharon your brother, and let him
not come at all times to the Kodesh, inside of the curtain, to be before the
covering that is upon the Ark, that he die not, for I am revealed in a cloud
upon the covering." The revelation of the Divine Presence in fire
reinforces our consciousness of awe. Fire = strict justice = awe. In the haftara
for Parashat Shemini (II Shemuel 6) we read of the death of Uza,
who grasped the Ark of the covenant when the oxen stumbled. King David
questions the injustice that is even more apparent there than it is in our
instance; after all, Nadav and Avihu committed some sort of sin. The answer, of
course, lies not in the moral sphere, but rather in the metaphysical: a person
who enters a fire is burnt, no matter how good his intentions. The closeness of
God, face to face, is a supremely dangerous experience ("For I have seen
God face to face and my life was spared"). Direct contact is deadly.
Moshe's
"apology," and his acceptance of Aharon's mourning later on, arise
from the perception of the event as an accident. Had there been a sin here
worthy of such a punishment, Moshe would not display empathy – as he did not,
in fact, in other situations when faced with a desecration of God's Name or
rebellion, even on the part of family members. Here the situation is different:
the victim of an accident is deserving of empathy. And therefore Aharon's
inability to eat of the sin offering is accepted with love: "Moshe heard,
and it was good in his eyes."
The
command not to drink wine, which follows immediately after this story, arises
from the same perception. The consumption of wine in and of itself is not
prohibited; under certain conditions it is appropriate and praiseworthy. But a
person who drinks wine is not careful, and he may endanger himself and be hurt.
God's Sanctuary must be approached with zeal, on one hand, together with
caution, on the other. Caution expresses awe. The death of Nadav and Avihu is
an extreme expression of the consciousness of awe and of the revelation of
justice – fire. Not punishment, but justice as a mode of revelation, with all
that it entails.
Notes:
[1] The Ramban deals
at length with the problems arising from Shemot 39:2 and the beginning
of Sefer Vayikra.
[2] The expression,
"It shall be sanctified by My glory" may also be interpreted to refer
to the Mishkan, but since it appears at the end of a verse that begins by
talking about the altar, it would seem to be telling us that the revelation is
not only in the Tent of Meeting, but also upon the altar.
[3] Several Rishonim
explain the situation thus; see the Ibn Ezra and the Seforno.
[4] The order set
out here reflects one of the exegetical approaches. The problem of the dates is
a complicated one; it also involves the verses in Sefer Bamidbar that
describe the dedication of the Mishkan and of the altar. We adopt the above
view on the basis of our understanding of the course of events as described in
the text; see also below.
[5] My friend and
colleague, Rav Yonatan Grossman, interprets the situation differently – in
almost the opposite way – based on the assumption that the command concerning
the eighth day is omitted altogether, and ignoring the fact that Moshe is
issuing an instruction here on his own initiative. He writes: "In light of
this understanding, we may go back and answer the question that we posed at the
outset. It would seem that the omission of the eighth day from the command in Sefer
Shemot expresses the fact that there is no guarantee that this day will in
fact come to pass! Am Yisrael may perform all that they have been
commanded – they may exert themselves in building the Mishkan, they may
sanctify the vessels and prepare the kohanim to serve – but the
revelation of God and His entry into the Mishkan are still conditional, up
until the moment that God decides to do this. Essentially, there can be no
command concerning the eighth day before the Mishkan is built and before the
seven days of consecration. Such a command would make the resting of the Divine
Presence in the Mishkan the necessary, almost inevitable, result of a
supernatural process that takes place during the seven days of consecration –
and this is not so. The resting of the Divine Presence is dependent upon God's
own free will. Only if He finds His nation worthy will He choose to cause His
Presence to rest in their midst. Admittedly, the purpose of the construction of
the Mishkan and of the seven days of consecration are the eighth day with God's
revelation in the Mishkan, but this day cannot be commanded. This day remains a
hidden potential until God wills to enter and dwell in the Mishkan built for
him by mortals.
As we understand it,
an essential part of God's revelation is the element of unexpectedness. A
person may prepare himself for revelation, he may aspire to it and prepare the
ground for its realization – but the actual Divine revelation is still a
conditional possibility. When it happens, it emerges suddenly and without warning,
and man – despite all of his psychological readiness – can only be overwhelmed:
'When all the nation saw, they shouted and fell upon their faces' (9:24)."
(Archives of the Virtual Beit Midrash, Yeshivat Har Etzion).
[6] As to the choice
of these specific sacrifices, I hope to address that subject elsewhere.
Translated by Kaeren
Fish