Masekhtot - Iyun (Gittin / Pesachim)
Teacher Title Abstract
שיעורי טקסט Rav Yair Kahn Masekhet Ketubot 54a The Widow's Residence
שיעורי טקסט Rav Yair Kahn Introduction to the Eighth Perek of Bava Metzia
שיעורי טקסט Rav Yair Kahn Daf 94a - 95a The Four Shomrim - An Overview
שיעורי טקסט Rav Yair Kahn The Responsibility of a Sho'el (94b)
שיעורי טקסט Rav Moshe Taragin She'ila Be-Ba'alim The Mishna (Bava Metzia 94a) discusses the din of she'ila be-ba'alim: If one BORROWS a cow and contracts its owner (ba'al) to work for him, he is NOT liable for damages, should anything happen to the animal.
שיעורי טקסט Rav Ezra Bick Shemira Be-Ba'alim (95b)
שיעורי טקסט Rav Ezra Bick Daf 96a
שיעורי טקסט Rav David Brofsky Shelichut and Be-Ba'alim
שיעורי טקסט Rav Yair Kahn Meita Machmat Melakha (96b)
שיעורי טקסט Rav Shmuel Ziderman Be-Idan Avidetaihu (97a)
שיעורי טקסט Rav Binyamin Tabory Does One Witness Preclude the Obligation of an Oath
שיעורי טקסט Rav Yair Kahn The Religious Dimension of Jewish Civil Law
שיעורי טקסט Harav Baruch Gigi Yachloku - daf 2a The mishna (daf 2a) discusses a scenario where two people appear before beit din, clutching onto a talit (garment). Each one claims that he found the talit, thus granting him sole ownership thereof.
שיעורי טקסט Rav Yair Kahn Yehei Munach Ad She-yavo Eliyahu Our mishna applies yachloku where the two litigants holding on to the talit claim "I FOUND it first." There is a debate among the Rishonim concerning a case where the respective claim of the litigants is "I personally WOVE it" - "ani aragtiha."
שיעורי טקסט Rav Yair Kahn Mamon Ha-mutal Be-safek - The Dispute of Simkhus and Chakhamim
שיעורי טקסט Rav Yair Kahn Shiur #04 (5776): The Religious Dimension of Jewish Civil Law
שיעורי טקסט Rav Binyamin Tabory Shiur #05 (5776): Can One Witness or a Migu Preclude the Obligation of an Oath?
שיעורי טקסט Rav Moshe Taragin R. Chiya Kamayta Having already addressed the basis of the halakha of modeh be-miktzat and the factors which generate an obligation to take an oath, we now turn our attention to the question of Rav Chiya.
שיעורי טקסט Rav Yosef Zvi Rimon Hoda'at Ba'al Din Our sugya (daf 3b) deals with the relationship between hoda'at ba'al din (the admission of the defendant) and testimony of witnesses.
שיעורי טקסט Rav Yair Kahn The Kal Va-chomer From Hoda'a to Eidim (3b) One who altogether denies a monetary claim against him need not take a shevu'a de-orayta (oath mandated by the Torah), and must take only a shevu'at heset (oath instituted by Chazal).
שיעורי טקסט Rav Joshua Amaru What Generates the Obligation of a Shevu'a In a previous shiur, we addressed R. Chiya's assertion that the defendant is obligated to take an oath in a situation where two witnesses testify that he owes part of a claim which he completely denies.
שיעורי טקסט Rav Ezra Bick Heilakh - 4a The gemara's second version of R. Chiya's statement concerns the halakha of "heilakh."
שיעורי טקסט Rav Eli Schorr Daf 4b Ein Nishba'in Al Kefirat Shi'abud Karka'ot The gemara (daf 4b) discusses the rule "ein nishba'in al kefirat shi'abud karka'ot" - there is no vow taken in the case of a denial of a monetary obligation on which there is a lein of land. According to this rule the Gemara suggests that, as a rule there can be no vow in the case of a shtar. This law will be the focus of our shiur this week.
שיעורי טקסט Rav Yair Kahn One Who Admits to the Claim in Regard to Land But Denies the Claim in Regard to Vessels – The Relationship Between the Claim and the Admission Daf 4b: This shiur will deal with a claim consisting of two parts, one relating to land and the other relating to vessels (movables).
שיעורי טקסט Rav Yair Kahn 4b - Gilgul Shevu'a According to the Gemara's conclusion (4b), the mishna in Shavuot comes to teach us the concept of "gilgul shevu'a". The Gemara in Masekhet Kiddushin (27b) establishes the Torah origin of the gilgul shevu'a provision, and derives it from the oath taken by the sota.
שיעורי טקסט Rav Elyakim Krumbein Mitokh She-eino Yakhol Lehishava - Mishalem Tosafot (5a s.v. She-kenegdo) take note of the prescribed procedure when a defendant who is obligated to swear cannot do so because he is chashud - not trustworthy (e.g., has lied in the past).
שיעורי טקסט Rav David Brofsky Chashud al Ha-shevu'a This week we will take a closer look at the principle of "chashud al ha-shevu'a," that one who has been proven to be a thief, or one who has previously taken a false oath, is disqualified from taking a shevu'a.
שיעורי טקסט Rav Yair Kahn Takfa Echad Befaneinu R. Zera raises a question relating to the case of our mishna "shnayim ochazim be-tallit" - Takfa echad be-faneinu mahu - what is the halakha if one of the two litigants grabs the entire tallit in our (beit din's) presence?
שיעורי טקסט Harav Baruch Gigi Tefisa Bi-Sefeikot - Seizure in questionable cases In our sugya the conclusion of most of the Rishonim is that if a kohen seized a questionable bekhor (firstborn), the halakha is that we take it away from him. This is because tefisa bi-sefeikot (seizure in questionable cases - whether there is a doubt concerning the identity or ownership of an object or if the ruling of the case in general is questionable) is not effective. However, from other sugyot it seems that tefisa (seizure) is effective.
שיעורי טקסט Rav Yair Kahn Shiur #18: Minyan Ha-raui The laws of ma'aser beheima obligate one to set aside one of ten animals born to his flock in any given year and to offer it as a sacrifice.

Pages