Sacrifice and Suffering in the Thought of R. Weinberg
MODERN RABBINIC
THOUGHT
By Rav
The previous
installments in this series can be accessed at:
http://vbm-torah.org/modern.html
Lecture #33:
Sacrifice and Suffering in the Thought of R. Weinberg
Many scholars have
studied the halakhic responsa of R. Weinberg; few know about his contribution to
the world of Jewish thought. His
Li-Frakim includes, among other things, insightful readings of
aggadot and powerful sermons.
Our discussion now turns to an analysis of some of the central themes in
this work.
The theme of the need
for sacrifice reverberates through several of the sermons. For example, the midrash
(Vayikra Rabba 9:8) states that the Jewish People became frightened upon
hearing about the sacrificial order.
Moshe calmed them down by saying, Study Torah and you need not fear any
of this. What was the
initial cause of fright and how did Moshes mention of the Torah alleviate the
tension? According to some commentators, the people thought that achieving
atonement depends on the
In several sermons,
R. Weinberg utilizes the sacrificial order as a symbol of willingness to
sacrifice rather than focusing on the narrower meaning of offerings brought on
the altar. In one sermon,[2]
R. Weinberg cites a midrash (Vayikra Rabba 21:11) that says that
the High Priest entered the Holy of Holies on Yom Kippur with the merit of
Shabbat. R. Weinberg explains that
Shabbat provides something crucial beyond the sacrificial order. In fact, he argues, the sanctity
of Shabbat overrides the sanctity of the
Historical context
helps provide fuller understanding of R. Weinbergs goals in this sermon. He explicitly criticizes those
The emphasis on
Shabbat includes a discussion of the sacrifices demanded by Shabbat
observance. It is not easy for a
struggling store owner to close up his shop for two consecutive days. R. Weinberg understands the difficulty,
but he exhorts the audience to make this sacrifice. Indeed, all the most valuable things in
life make similar demands.
It is difficult to
bring sacrifices, claim the Shabbat desecrators, but is there an
alternative? Not only religion, and
not only Judaism, but every ethic demands sacrifices. There is no beauty or greatness in the
world without sacrifices. Without
sacrifice, there is no love, friendship, family happiness, charity, or societal
life.[3]
R. Weinberg adds a
clever new reading of the biblical juxtaposition between Shabbat and the
commandment of honoring parents (Vayikra 19:3). Whereas our Sages derived from this that
adhering to a parental request does not override Shabbat observance, R. Weinberg
finds another message. Shabbat
provides the opportunity for parents to positively influence their
children. Busy parents cannot serve
as exciting religious models for emulation during the work week. When Shabbat reveals the father in all
his glory and the mother in all her splendor, their child sees the beauty of
Jewish life.
Our ability to
sacrifice also ultimately impacts on our youth. The Torah describes the journey of
Avraham and Yitzchak on the way to the akeda: And the two of them walked
together (Bereishit 22:6, 8).
For R. Weinberg, this verse symbolizes the joint vision of parent and
child. The twentieth century has
witnessed many parents frustrated by their failure to raise children who share
their Jewish ideals. What explains
our inability to educate children with the success of Avraham? We must demand sacrifices of our
children and model such willingness to sacrifice in our own lives. If they see our unwillingness to forego
for the sake of Judaism, they naturally conclude that Judaism does not truly
bear ultimate value. If, like
Avraham, we exhibit intense dedication to our values, then our children will
learn to value them as well.
A delicate balance
animates Avrahams mood on the way to
Another
derasha delivered in
To support his idea
that Judaism lacks enthusiasm for war per se, R. Weinberg cites the
famous verses in which Kind David relates that he cannot build the Temple
because he spilled much blood (Divrei Ha-yamim I 22:8). Another example is found in our practice
of blowing one hundred shofar blasts on Rosh Hashana. Tosafot (Rosh Hashana 33b) say
that these one hundred sounds commemorate the cries of Siseras mother when she
heard of her sons demise. In R.
Weinbergs words, Many hundreds of years have passed since then, and the Jewish
conscience still cannot forget the sighs of a suffering and innocent mother.[7] No bloodthirsty people could think in
such terms.
At the same time, the
Rosh Hashana shofar does reflect a war cry - the combat refers not to
battle with other people, however, but to humanitys struggle with itself and
its animalistic aspects. R.
Weinberg mentions the gentile criticism that Jews separate from the community
when the times demand sacrifice.
Presumably, the criticism refers to Jewish attempts to avoid the draft of
various gentile armies over the centuries.
R. Weinberg defends our practice: It is not possible to conquer our
hearts for ideals that bring destruction to humanity. However, we were the first to offer
sacrifices for an ethical vision.
In other words, we avoided sacrifice for the sake of Tsarist Russias
territorial expansion; we willingly sacrificed for authentic religious
ideals.
We can appreciate the
emphases in the sermons above when they are viewed in the light of early
twentieth century Judaism.
Emancipation, Enlightenment, the Industrial Revolution, and the collapse
of the ghetto walls created novel opportunities for Western Jews. Many were tempted to abandon the ways of
their forefathers in the hopes of achieving a more secure and affluent life for
their families. Facing this
population, R. Weinberg stresses the need for sacrifice and idealism.
R. Weinbergs aggadic
interpretations reveal a focus on the impact of suffering. The first chapter of Berakhot
contains an extensive analysis of suffering, and R. Weinberg contributes
three interpretations analyzing sections of that gemara. The gemara mentions a model of
afflictions of love, a suffering not rooted in sin but rather in an expression
of divine favor (Berakhot 5a), and develops an a fortiori argument
from the case of a slave. If a gentile slave receives his freedom after his
master knocks out the slaves eye or tooth, then surely suffering which afflicts
the entirety of persons body enhances the sufferer. But how does suffering benefit a
person?
To answer this
question, R. Weinberg notes that slavery consists of both physical servitude and
a subjugation of the spirit. The
latter actually reflects the more terrible aspect of slavery. It is most tragic
when a slave, beaten down from years of back- breaking work, lacks even the
aspiration for freedom. R. Weinberg
argues that occasions in which the master mistreats his slave to the extent of
permanent limb damage remind the slave that life was never meant to include such
afflictions. At that point, the
slave realizes his terrible situation and yearns for freedom.
This idea answers a
question posed by the Haflaah, R. Pinchas Horowitz. The Tannaim debate whether it is
a zekhut (privilege) or a chova (obligation) for a slave to
achieve freedom (Gittin 12b).
The position contending that it is a privilege requires little
explanation. R. Meir views the
slaves freedom as a disadvantage for the slave because he loses certain
rights. For example, the slave of a
priest loses the ability to eat teruma upon achieving freedom. R. Horowitz wonders how R. Meirs
position coheres with the idea that we free a slave when his master knocks out a
tooth. Do we punish a slave for the
violent crimes of his master? R.
Weinberg explains that R. Meir stated his position only regarding slaves
immersed in the identity of servitude. Once a slave awakens to the human tragedy
of slavery, he immediately values his freedom much more than any rights he holds
as a slave. Thus, the violence
itself impacts on the slaves attitude and converts freedom into a
zekhut.
In the same way,
every person has certain abilities and strengths lurking within him that are
currently bound and await release.
Suffering releases those forces and the human being grows into a
different person. This explanation
provides a new perspective on afflictions of love. God obviously does not enjoy afflicting
suffering. He created a world with difficulties as a way of promoting character
development and growth.[8]
The same Talmudic
page compares suffering to salt: Just as salt sweetens meat, so too suffering
cleanses a persons sins. R.
Weinberg contends that the parallel to salt also refers to the need for
suffering to be distributed in the proper measure. Eating plain salt provides no pleasure;
a life dominated by suffering does not enable constructive purpose. This limitation enables R. Weinberg to
write about the positive impact of suffering without masochistically embracing
suffering as the desired goal of life.
Overcoming difficulties facilitates human growth, but we do not aspire to
a life of misery.[9]
Reflecting on the
above, we cannot help but be reminded of the many difficulties R. Weinberg faced
in his own life. This connection
between biography and ideology in no way undermines the cogency of R. Weinbergs
thought. Quite the contrary! R. Weinberg did not sit back in a
comfortable chair sipping a drink while writing about the importance of
sacrifice and suffering. Rather, he
experienced these things upon his own flesh, and this gives him the credibility
to write about it. Despite a
difficult life, he continued to develop and contribute great works to the canon
of Torah literature.
[1] Li-Frakim
(Jerusalem, 2002), pp. 502-505.
[2] Ibid., pp.
518-522.
[3] Ibid., p.
521.
[4] This midrash
actually attributes the tears to the angels, but R. Weinberg interprets the
angelic tears as symbolizing the emotional turmoil of our first patriarch.
[5] The thoughts in this and
the preceding paragraph appear in Li-Frakim, pp.
514-517.
[6] Ibid., pp. 510-513.
[7] Ibid., p.
512.
[8] Ibid., pp. 387-388. For a more developed treatment of this
and other approaches to afflictions of love, see my Fresh Fruit and Vintage
Wine: The Ethics and Wisdom of the Aggada (Jersey City: Ktav, 2009), pp.
151-155.
[9] Li-Frakim, p.
389.
This website is constantly being improved. We would appreciate hearing from you. Questions and comments on the classes are welcome, as is help in tagging, categorizing, and creating brief summaries of the classes. Thank you for being part of the Torat Har Etzion community!