Shiur #29: Chapter 22 ֠Yehoshafat, King of Yehuda
Sefer Melakhim: The Book of Kings
Please pray for a refua sheleima for
Shimon Elimelech HaCohen ben Sima Rivka
Gilad Hillel ben Bracha Mirel
Shiur #29 Chapter 22 Yehoshafat, King of Yehuda
King Yehoshafat of Yehuda is a strong leader with impressive achievements, and his agenda of national reconciliation raises challenging contemporary dilemmas. Tucked away at the end of Melakhim I in a sparse telegraphic summary, he hardly makes an impression, but his reign was a high point for the kingdom of Yehuda. In Divrei Ha-yamim, it is described in luxurious detail, spanning four extensive chapters.
Who is Yehoshafat and what legacy did he leave? What should we remember him for?
build upon the firm base built by his father, Assa. If you recall (Melakhim I ch.15),
Assa reigned for 41 years. His
prime accomplishment according to Melakhim was his anti-idolatry policy,
as he dismantled pagan sites of worship and their associated cultural
influence. This included the
destruction of an image instituted by his own grandmother. In addition, Assa boosted the prestige
of the Temple. On the military
front, he ended the protracted internecine tensions with the Northern
Kingdom. Rather than engaging
Yehoshafat follows King Assa. Sefer Melakhim depicts him with its hallmark formulaic language and we therefore fail to gain a significant impression of the man. However, we will engage in an exercise of close reading to demonstrate the manner in which much of the significant information may be extracted from the clues and indicators embedded in the text of Sefer Melakhim.
He walked in all the way of Asa his father; he did not turn aside from it, doing right in the sight of God The remnant of the Kadesh who remained in the days of his father Asa, he expelled from the land. (vv. 44, 47)
The first important detail, other than his age at his ascension to the throne and his 25 year reign, is the fact that he "did that which was right (straight) in the sight of God;" in other words, he did not succumb to avoda zara. In this regard, the text of Sefer Melakhim informs us that he engaged in a comprehensive campaign to rid the country of the Kadesh (v. 47), continuing the war against idolatry waged by his father and predecessor. Clearly, Yehoshafat made extraordinary efforts to eradicate any traces and trappings of idolatrous culture.
Yehoshafat also made peace with the king of Israel. (v. 44)
The next detail is the manner in which Yehoshafat extends his hand in peace towards with the Northern Kingdom. This would appear to pass without comment or evaluation; however, we will see that this is more problematic than one would know at first glance. Pasuk 50 makes an enigmatic reference to a situation in which Yehoshafat rejects an offer to team up with Achav's successor, Achazyahu:
Then Achazyahu, son of Achav, proposed to Yehoshafat, Let my servants sail with your servants by sea, but Yehoshafat would not agree. (v. 50)
Why does Yehoshafat rebuff Achazyahu? What was problematic in his offer? We will see the complementary account in Divrei Ha-yamim, which will supply the missing information.
PROSPERITY AND POWER:
Now there was no king in
We can tell that this was a
period of enormous prosperity and extensive political hegemony over the
region. There are a number of clues
here: Yeshoshafat's control of Etzion Gaver
(v. 48) means that he has the wherewithal to build and maintain a sea port a
great distance away from the national capital and the major population
concentration of Yehuda.
Additionally, protection of the port and its supply lines mean that
Yehoshafat has full and uncontested control of the route to Eilat. Only kings who had regional control
could mount such a project. In
support of this theory of Yehoshafat's regional power, we should note how v.48
tells us that
So we gain quite a good picture of the events of Yehoshafat's life from a careful reading of the few details listed here in Melakhim. We might question why we need to hear about the breaking of Yehoshafat's fleet at Etzion-Gaver. One feels that there is more to this story than is being communicated. And this is true. Yehoshafat's story bursts to life in Divrei Ha-yamim. I strongly recommend that you read the chapters there.
Chapter 17 of Divrei Ha-yamim lists several aspects of Yehoshafat's reign:
17:7-9 Spreading Torah study nationally
17:10-11 Regional Power
17:12 Building projects
17:13 Industry and GNP
17:14-19 A huge, organised army
With all the impressive details, one gains an understanding that Yehoshafat's reign is reminiscent of Shlomo's (except that he didn't fall at all into the trap of avoda zara). Maybe this also explains his desire to unify the nation with his alliance with Achav and later Achazyahu. He saw the country returning to its heyday, and the natural thing to do in this environment was to unify. Hence his son's marriage to Achav's daughter.
Chapter 19 describes an
impressive story of a miraculous and faith-driven war situation in which Yehudah
is threatened by neighbouring states, Moav and Edom. God miraculously saves Yehudah without
their even needing to engage in battle! The entire depiction is rich with
references to God. Yehoshafat
quotes Shlomos prayer at the
DILEMMAS OF UNITY
And yet all is not perfect
Do you seek to assist the evil, and demonstrate love to those who hate God? (19:2)
Similarly, after Yehoshafat joins with Achazyahu to build a joint navy, the navi Elazar ben Dodavahu approaches the king:
Because you have joined with Achaziah, the Lord will destroy what you have made. And the ships were wrecked and were not able to go to Tarshish. (20:37)
We thus see the prophet's criticism of Yehoshsafat's national unity project.
We might think that
Yehoshafat would recant on his policy, but he persists. In Melakhim II ch.3, we find him
with yet another king of Yisrael - Yoram.
The prophet Elisha expresses quite vocally that the king of
Were it not that I respect king Yehoshafat of Yehuda, I wouldn't look at you or notice you. (3:14)
And so we understand that Yehoshafat's policy of national unity is a deliberate one.
With this heavy prophetic criticism, one must confront the question as to whether this unity was mistaken. One essential observation is that each of the joint ventures faltered or failed -:The joint military front of Achav and Yehoshaft resulted in defeat and the death of Achav. The boats of the Yehoshafat-Achazyahu naval alliance never made it out to sea. And the war in which Yehoshafat joins with Yoram (Melakhim II ch.3) also ends on a sour note. Avot De-Rabbi Natan draws an obvious conclusion based upon the teaching of Nitai HaArbeli that cautions against affiliation with the evil:
Nitai HaArbeli said: Keep far from a bad neighbour, and do not associate with an evil person (Pirkei Avot 1:7)
As we see with Yehoshafat, who joined together with Achav, and they went up [in war] together to Ramot Gilad, rousing God's anger against him. Again he associated with Achazyahu and they made boats together in Etzion-Gaver and God disrupted their actions (Avot De-Rabbi Natan 9:4)
What should we conclude? Here I wonder about Yehoshafat as a model for our fragmented contemporary Jewish world. Is it wrong to forge alliances, thereby generating a sense of national cohesion and Achdut (unity), if our partner is acting in contravention of the Torah? Is it not possible that it is correct to heal internal frictions despite the differences in religious orientation? Or perhaps Achav and his sons were so potentially harmful that in THIS case it was inadvisable. As we shall see in Melakhim II, the marriage between Yehoshafat and the House of Omri resulted in a disastrous descent into idolatry and violent political opportunism. There is no doubt that the prophets were alerting the king to genuine problems. And yet, at the ideological level, the question remains as to whether this view should be the only model. When do we overlook religious differences and unite, and when do we act discriminatingly?
YEHOSHAFAT MISHPAT / JUSTICE
The feature that may have given Yehoshafat his name is the issue of law and Justice. Yehoshafat began his monarchy with a passion for spreading Torah:
...In the third year of his
reign, he sent his officials, Ben-chayil, Ovadiah, Zechariah, Nethanel and
Michaya, to teach in the cities of Judah; and with them the Leviim,
Shemaya, Netanya, Zevadya, Asahel, Shemiramot, Yehonathan, Adoniya, Toviya and
Tov-Adoniya, the Leviim; and with them Elishama and Yehoram, the
Kohanim. They taught in
However, when he returns from his joint war campaign with Achav, he is greeted by the prophet, calling him to do teshuva to engage in an act of improvement or repair. Yehoshafat decides to rehabilitate the legal system:
Yehoshafat lived in Jerusalem and went
out among the people from Beer-sheva to Har Ephraim and brought them back to
Hashem, the God of their fathers.
He appointed judges in the land in all the fortified cities of Yehuda,
city by city. He instructed the
judges, Consider what you are doing, for you do not judge for man but for the
Lord who is with you when you render judgment. Now then let the fear of the Lord be
upon you; be very careful what you do, for the Lord our God will have no part in
unrighteousness or partiality or the taking of a bribe. In
This becomes the basis of an important instruction to judges:
Do not be afraid of any man: You might say I am scared of that man. Perhaps his son will murder me, or he will set my haystack alight, or cut down my orchard? So the Torah teaches: Do not be afraid of any man, for the law is to God. This is what Yehoshafat said: Consider what you are doing, for you do not judge for man but for the Lord. (Sifrei, Devarim #17 and see Sanhedrin, Tosefta 1:4)
In other words, here is a king who understands that his mission is to spread Gods law. He embarks on a huge undertaking to make the forces of justice and Gods law present and accessible to the nation, establishing courts in every locale. He trains and coaches his judges, fully aware of the issues like intimidation, impartiality and bribery, warning them that they are answerable to God Himself. Reading through this chapter, one is impressed of Yehoshafats God awareness, as he instructs his judiciary, attempting to impart to them that they are imparting Gods law, and that God is present amongst His judges.
Yehoshafat reflects Shlomo in many aspects, such as the extensive building, regional power and wealth. But possibly this aspect of mishpat draws the greatest parallel with the man who requested a listening heart to judge Your people (Melakhim I 3:9). Whereas Shlomos opening story is a difficult courtroom battle, Yehoshafat establishes an entire network of courts, spreading Gods law beyond the confines of Jerusalem. In conclusion, we might see Yehoshafat as superior even to Shlomo in his positive and responsive interactions with the navi and the fact that, despite his association with Achav, he is insusceptible to idolatry. In the landscape of Sefer Melakhim, Yehoshafat stands as one of the greatest and most impressive kings of Yehuda.
This is the last of our shiurim on Melakhim I. We will be back soon with our series on Melakhim II.
 Divrei Ha-yamim II ch.17-20
 On the coast
 As we can see from archeological evidence eg. The Mesha tablet, we know that Achav wielded similar influence further north in Moav.
 The question of who married whom between Yehoshafat and Achav's family, is a complicated one. See Melakhim II 8:18 and 26-7. See also Divrei Ha-yamim II 18:1-2. The pesukim do not state clearly whether Yehoram married Achav's daughter, or whether Yehoshafat married Omri's daughter. Most commentaries assume that Yehoshafat allowed his son to marry Achav's daughter. But Seder Olam suggests that Yehoshafat married achav's sister; Omri's daughter. See Daat Mikra in Melakhim II ch.8.
 Melakhim II 8:18
 The story of Atalia (Izevels daughter), who killed the entire royal family of Yehuda (Melakhim II 8:26,29 and 11:1-16).
 In the past century, confronted by rampant secularisation, scholars from Rav Kook to the Chazon Ish affirmed a readjustment of sanctions against Shabbat desecrators, understanding that these people were far from the traditional heretic or a renegade Jew. Is there a difference between a Jew who engages in direct, self-aware, flagrant rebellion against God and those who are seen as victims of circumstance?
 The phenomenon of midrash shemot names whose meaning connects with the text is widespread in Tanakh. Good examples are Yaakov, Naomi, and Naval. In each case, the characters comment about the meanings of their own names, indicating a consistency of name and biography. Notwithstanding the comment of the Ibn Ezra (Bereishit 46:8), who suggests that one not analyze meanings of names other than those explicitly derived in the Tanakh, Midrash is replete with name wordplay, and modern literary analysis has also made use of the meanings of the names of Biblical characters.
 See Tehillim ch.82:1 and the Ramban on Shemot 24:8, who deals with the overlap between the Judges and God in this context.