Holiness and Emuna, Part I: A Life of Personal and Interpersonal Holiness
Bein Adam Le-chavero: Ethics of Interpersonal Conduct
By Rav
Binyamin Zimmerman
Shiur #30: Holiness and Emuna, Part I:
A Life of Personal and Interpersonal Holiness
The Recipe for Holiness
In our last lesson, we
defined emuna and saw how fundamental a role it plays in forging the
honesty and integrity needed to bring ones inner convictions to business
transactions. In this lesson the last for this session and, at least for the
time being, the last lesson in this series we will examine how this
understanding of emuna is spotlighted by the entire chapter of Vayikra
19, whose interpersonal mitzvot have been a prime subject of our lessons.
Parashat Kedoshim is the part of the Torah dedicated to guiding the
Jew to a life of holiness. To be sure, all of the mitzvot are rooted in
holiness and impart sanctity to those who observe them. As we say in the
blessings recited on their performance, asher kiddeshanu be-mitzvotav
God sanctified us with his commandments. Nonetheless, the Torah entitles this
particular chapter of mitzvot with the words you shall be holy (Vayikra
19:2). It is these mitzvot that provide the most potent formula for a
life of holiness, as the Torah repeats throughout the chapter and into the next.
With the unfolding of
these verses, we gain a much deeper understanding of the concept of holiness,
and the scope of numerous mitzvot is broadened to include not only what
is obviously wrong, but grey areas as well. For instance, the prohibitions
against stealing and robbing are self-explanatory, but their placement in
Vayikra 19 implies that not only is taking anothers money forbidden, but so
is any form of illicitly taking from another person. One may not even steal from
someone who owes him money, and some opinions even forbid stealing back ones
own possessions. Similarly, one may not engage in deceptive practices, even for
a good cause. All this is included in not stealing. The Torah identifies
stealing as a morally deleterious action one that is antithetical to holiness
and therefore the nation of Israel, which must be driven by the call to
holiness (see Year 1, Lessons 2527), is prohibited in almost all instances from
engaging in such behavior.
Aside from the
prohibition of theft per se, Vayikra 19 introduces a number of additional
mitzvot that mandate integrity in business dealings, especially where
dishonesty might seem profitable. As we have seen, the Jews business dealings
must be characterized by emuna: unwavering knowledge of and steadfast
commitment to God, appreciation of His existence, and recognition of the basic
spiritual principles by which He runs the world. Because truth and emuna
are intimately intertwined, an obligation to behave with emuna is equally
a call to live life by the code of truth.
Our chapter not only
broadens and illuminates numerous mitzvot, but declares unequivocally
that a holy life is not defined only by ritual obligations to God, but also by
fulfillment of interpersonal obligations. The chapter brings together
interpersonal and ritual requirements, sometimes in the same verse, because both
are fundamental components of holiness.
In this two-part closing
lesson, we will consider how emuna, which is so central to the character
of a person oriented toward interpersonal holiness, also is the guiding
principle of many ritual mitzvot in the chapter. In so doing, we will see
how the interpersonal and the ritual are not only two necessary parts of a holy
personality, but are rooted in the same core, and intertwined in more ways than
one.
You Shall Be Holy
If emuna is not
only belief in God, but unwavering certainty and consistency in commitment to
Him, then attaining it requires development of an understanding of the way in
which God runs the world, as Rambam notes in his Principles of Faith. This
awareness must be accompanied by an appreciation of Gods holiness, as well as
of His commandment that man model himself after Gods behavior.
Let us now revisit the
introductory verses of Vayikra 19:
God spoke to Moshe,
saying, Speak to the entire assembly of the Israelites. You shall to them, You
shall be holy, for I, the Lord, your God, am holy.
As Rav Avigdor Miller relates:
Kedusha [holiness] is in line with perfection; objects
become kodesh [holy] when dedicated to Gods service, and similarly man
can also become holy through fulfillment of Gods mitzvot, which endow
man with a touch of Gods holiness (as indicated in the blessings made over
mitzvot who has sanctified us with His commandments
), and by studying
the ways of God and endeavoring to model oneself after His ways. In Shemoneh
Esrei we recognize God as the Holy God, because as we recognize and show
gratitude for His perfection, we recognize that we have endless opportunities to
emulate Him and shape our behavior and thoughts according to His model. We
identify the Holiness of God in His Torah, as well by studying His ways that are
apparent in nature and history, just as Avraham did. Recognizing the charge for
holiness is also connected to Hashem our God being holy, reminds us of our
intrinsic holiness, built into our very nature. (A Kingdom of Kohanim, p.
189)
The mitzva of being holy requires that we
instill the attitudes of perfection into our personalities, and stimulate our
intrinsic spiritual strengths to grow, blossom forth, and produce the fruit of
which they are capable.
Being holy, though, is
not only a commandment. It is also a reward to live a godly life and behave in a
godlike manner. Further, since Gods existence is the only true existence in the
world, as we discussed previously, only one who emulates Gods actions truly
exists in this world, rather than in a world of fantasy that he builds around
himself.
It is for this reason
that the directive to be holy brings together many mitzvot that not only
perfect mans personality, but also facilitate his understanding of God.
The Root of Emotional Connection to God
A person with emuna
not only can maintain integrity in business a major theme of the chapters
mitzvot but realizes that whatever happens in life has a purpose. He uses
his life to influence those who act improperly, and recognizes that love of
ones fellow Jew not hatred or revenge (see final lessons of Year 2) is
almost always the proper response to impropriety.
Not only is this message
clearly expressed by the chapters interpersonal mitzvot, but many ritual
mitzvot scattered within it are directly related to awareness of Gods
existence, the purpose of nature in general, and that of human life in
particular. The chapter begins with the mitzva of Shabbat, which reflects
emuna by attesting to Gods creation of the world. Juxtaposed to it is the
mitzva to act with awe toward ones parents, which is a means of developing a
stronger connection to and appreciation of God through interaction with His
direct messengers in this world (see Lesson 5 of this year).
The commandment to
safeguard Shabbat is repeated in verse 30, this time appearing alongside the
mitzva to act with awe toward the Beit Ha-mikdash. By logical extension,
the midrash (Sifra, Kedoshim 3) notes, this mitzva requires us to
relate to God with awe:
It is not toward the
Beit Ha-mikdash that you exhibit awe, but rather toward Him who commanded
regarding it.
The emotion of awe mora, also
translated as fear is referenced throughout the chapter, and is accompanied
by mitzvot that require development of the emotion of love as well, both
love of fellow man and love of God. The twin emotions of love and awe of God are
a crucial part of the religious fabric of a person who relates to God as a
reality in his life. Yet as central as these emotions are to a religious
personality, only by recognizing their relationship to emuna can one
recognize how essential they are in the greater lesson of holiness.
As Rambam writes,
seeing Gods hand in the beauty and splendor of nature
is a precursor to love and fear of God:
What is the path to love and fear of
Him? When a person contemplates His wondrous and great deeds and creations and
appreciates that His infinite wisdom surpasses all comparison, he will
immediately love, praise, and glorify [Him], yearning with tremendous desire to
know [Gods] great name, as David stated: My soul thirsts for God, for the
living God (Tehillim 42:3). When he [continues] to reflect on these same
matters, he will immediately recoil in awe and fear, appreciating how he is a
tiny, lowly, and dark creature, standing with his flimsy, limited wisdom before
Him who has perfect knowledge, as David stated (ibid. 8:45), When I see
Your heavens, the work of Your fingers ... [I wonder] what is man that You
remember Him? (Hilkhot Yesodei Ha-Torah 2:2)
One who sees the hand of God throughout life
responds to the knowledge of His involvement with love and awe.
A Believers Perspective
Aside from educating us
about the importance of emuna in our lives, Parashat Kedoshim
makes a point of defining what emuna is and what it is not.
One reason holiness is so
intertwined with emuna is that a proper understanding of emuna
reflects the essence of holiness. In our early lessons (Year 1,
Lessons 2122) we quoted a number of sources emphasizing
that the Torahs outlook on holiness is far different than what many people
think. Holiness is not to live an otherworldly existence, but to see the hand of
God in the physical world, to sanctify ones corporeal existence, to transcend
not deny
ones
worldly body.
The call to holiness thus
is associated with a number of mitzvot that define the parameters of
emuna and distance the individual from perspectives that may lead to a
misunderstanding of God. Two of these mitzvot are introduced with the
term, Do not turn:
Do not turn toward the
idols (elilim), nor shall you make graven gods for yourselves. I
am the Lord, your God. (verse 4)
Do not turn toward the
ovot and the yideonim;[1] do not seek to
become defiled thereby. I am the Lord, your God. (verse 31)
The parallel initial and final parts of these
verses present two different ways in which people might distance themselves from
God and from sanctity.
Rav Hirsch (to verse 4)
provides background to the first of the verses:
Elilim are powers that deny. This constitutes the heathen
conception of god, for the gods are powers that are hostile to man and hinder
his success. When a person relies only on himself, he senses everywhere the
limits of his own power; he senses that, in order to fulfill his aspirations and
desires, he is everywhere at war with higher powers, and that he must struggle
against them or flatter them so that they accede to his requests. This outlook
and this need more than anything else produced the heathen gods and their
cults. Even today, souls that become estranged from Jewish belief arrive, as a
result, at heathen beliefs and practices.
Such notions must have no
place in your conception of God. Do not direct your thoughts to divine beings
that are hostile to man and his aspirations. Do not even consider believing in
their existence.
As for the molten gods
banned by the end of the verse, Rav Hirsch explains that these are protective
gods considered necessary to protect man from harmful gods. More generally,
though, graven gods includes all idols all gods subjectively manufactured by
man out of moldable material. It is not man who forms God, nor is man to
imagine and conceive gods out of himself. Rather, he is to comprehend and
conceive himself out of God, for God is not only One who is not an elil
hostile to man and his existence
Rather, His eternal existence is the source
of our transient existence.
Thus the role of this
verse is to prevent man from falsifying his perception of God and consequently
looking for physical, subjective objects of worship.
The context of the
parallel mitzva at the end of the chapter is the directive to maintain an
accurate perception of God, which naturally is an essential aspect of emuna.
It comes shortly after the prohibition of nichush (verse 26) activity
based upon superstitious beliefs and the assumption that events of no
consequence can influence ones life. In introducing this prohibition, Rav
Hirsch explains:
Scripture now proceeds to
those activities that relate to the human body, regarding which Scripture seeks
to awaken
awareness, for this is the whole purpose of Jewish life: to keep us
from falling into a lifeless routine, or thoughtlessness; to educate us to
perform our actions with awareness and attentiveness. This holiness grasps every
opportunity to awaken in our minds the awareness of those truths that form the
basis of what we are and what we are meant to be. In light of these truths, we
are to evaluate our actions and aims, for the sake of attaining our moral
purpose, for a man is not worthy of his name unless he examines his ways, and to
the thinking man, there is nothing that is insignificant.
Rav Hirsch notes that
even the prohibition of rounding the hair on ones head, though a matter of
outward appearance, must be performed with an eye to holiness. Rambam explains
that a man is not permitted to round the corners of his hair because this was
the practice of idol worshippers, and our pursuit of holiness requires that we
distance ourselves from their ways. (Also see Rav Hirschs explanation of the
spiritual harm caused by the practice.)
The second mitzva not to
turn (Do not turn toward the ovot and the yideonim
) warns the
Jew not to seek answers from spirits and demons, describing this activity as an
active, conscious act of self-defilement: do not seek to become defiled
thereby. Such impurity is the diametrical opposite of the holiness of this
chapter. Rather than search out spirits, the Torah continues, we should seek out
the aged and scholarly, rising to show respect and honor for them, as they will
be able to guide us on a path of true spirituality and holiness.
The next chapter
continues in this vein, detailing the extent of the immoral behavior liable to
be practiced by one who refuses to recognize that I am the Lord, your God (the
refrain at the end of many of the verses in these chapters), including child
sacrifice and lewd, disgusting sexual behaviors. For this reason the chapter
twice commands us to be holy to develop a true understanding of holiness, not
one that leads to human sacrifice.
Recognizing God in the Physical World
In defining the nature of
holiness, we pointed out that sanctity is not expressed by denying ones
physical existence, but by sanctifying it. Thus a number of mitzvot in
Vayikra 19 remind man to aspire to holiness within earthly existence.
This may be why the
observance of Shabbat is mentioned twice in the chapter. Alsheikh (to verse 26)
notes that part of the purpose of Shabbat is to remind man that God does not
simply dwell apart from humanity in the heavens, and there is no need to go to
the soothsayers and necromancers of the world in order to seek a relationship
with Him. Shabbat, which testifies to Gods creation of the world, is the
disproof of the soothsaying worldview.
Alsheikh then cites the
account (Sanhedrin 65b) of how Rabbi Akiva demonstrated to Turnus Rufus,
the Roman governor, that the special status of Shabbat can be proven even to a
nonbeliever: on Shabbat, necromancers cannot exercise any control over dead
spirits with which they try to communicate. From the Torahs prohibition of such
practices, it is clear that they are antithetical to what Shabbat represents.
The chapter also extends
the sanctity of involvement in the physical world to fruit trees (verses 23
ff.), due to the need to ensure that even the act of eating is performed with
holiness. We are to wait three years before consuming the yield of our fruit
trees; eat the produce in sanctity in Jerusalem the fourth year; and only then,
from the fifth year, eat the fruit wherever we like. This discussion is followed
by another prohibition to enforce self-control in eating: Do not eat with the
blood (verse 26). The Gemara derives a number of prohibitions from this verse,
but as Rav Hirsch explains,
The concept that is
common to them all is that one must not eat under the influence of animal life
Eating, per se, belongs to the physical aspect of man. The act of eating, then,
is likely to impress upon our minds the idea of mans relation to the animal.
Therefore, when one is eating, it is necessary to call to mind mans duty and
moral purpose. Only thus is it possible to elevate the act of eating to the
sphere of moral, human action. Certainly, then, one should not eat under any
influence that calls to mind the opposite and causes one to lose sight of mans
moral freedom.
The prohibition against
wounding oneself on the death of a dear one (verse 28) carries a similar
message. A bereaved person is liable to tear at his own body, rather than his
clothing, if he views the death of a loved one as negating his own existence. A
Jew is rabbinically obligated to tear his clothing over the death of a relative,
in recognition of the tear that the death of the departed has made in the
survivors closest surroundings, in his intimate world (Rav Hirsch), but
self-mutilation would signal a breakdown of the survivors own body and
existence.
In fact, the loss of one
who meant a great deal to us must spur us on to redoubled vital energy, so that
we can help fill the gap that death has left in the work of serving God (ibid.)
Rambam gives a similar
rationale for refraining from excessive mourning:
A person should not become excessively
broken-hearted because of a persons death, as is stated: Do not weep for a
dead man and do not shake your head because of him (Yirmiyahu 22:10)
this means not to weep excessively for death is the way of the world, and a
person who causes himself grief because of the way of the world is a fool.
What should one do? Weep for three days,
eulogize for seven, and observe the restrictions on cutting hair and the other
five matters for thirty days. (Hilkhot Eivel 13:12)
Rambam does not discount the importance
of mourning and recognizing ones loss:
Whoever does not mourn over his dead in
the manner our sages commanded is cruel. Instead, one should be fearful, worry,
examine his deeds, and repent. (ibid. 13:13)
Rather, Rambam tells us that the loss should
be felt against the backdrop of the purpose of life. Living life with emuna
allows man to cope with grief and mourning, because amidst the difficulty
man can recognize Gods hand in the bigger picture.
Rav Hirsch adds that a
person whose approach to life centers on God will understand that honoring the
dead is not to be achieved through self-mutilation or by throwing away ones own
life:
It is not an act of
homage to the deceased, but a crime against God, Who decreed the death of the
departed, for it is He Who commands life upon you; He wills that you live and
serve Him until he calls you too to your eternal home. Every fiber of your
physical existence is sacred to Him.
External Effects of a Lack of Inner Sanctity
The message of the
holiness and purpose in a persons life is further reinforced by the next verse,
which discusses the holiness of the human body:
Do not profane your
daughter by causing her to act unfaithfully, so that the land not act
unfaithfully and the land not be filled with lewdness.
Beyond the direct effects
of a persons actions on his or her body, depraved actions affect ones
surroundings as well. A life of defiling behavior does impact the balance of a
persons mitzvot and sins, but also affects his character. A person who
refuses to live up to the dictates of holiness profanes his personality and
desecrates his innate holiness, while simultaneously damaging his surroundings.
Rav Hirsch (to verse 30)
explains the Torahs warning that sinful human actions would affect the
agricultural output of the Land of Israel:
The earth, as an
astronomical body, has a cosmic meaning, but the earths surface, which bears
the earths fruit, is called adama, and the adama is wedded to
man, adam. If man betrays his moral duty, then the land too will betray
man. If man is careless with the choice fruit of his world, viz. the seed and
fruit of man, the land too will withhold and spoil its fruit.
This relationship between
man and earth is expressed from the moment of Creation. In his commentary there
(Bereishit 1:26), Rav Hirsch takes issue with the common assumption that
the term adam is derived from adama, asserting that the opposite
is the case:
On the contrary, adama
is derived from adam. Further, man is not defined by his earthliness, for
his earthly origin is what he has in common with the other creatures, whereas
the uniqueness of man is that he is not created entirely from the earth. It is
the breath of God, breathed into his very earthly frame, that makes him man.
Rav Hirsch argues that
this in fact is the basis of Gods announcement in Bereishit (ibid.),
Let us make man
Man is the greatest
manifestation of the divine in this world, and through Him Gods presence is
revealed on Earth (this is the nature of relationship of the word adam to
the color adom, as red light is the least refracted of all light).
Similarly, adam is similar to the word hadom, footstool, as man is
the agent and bearer of Gods glory on Earth.
In the second part of
this lesson, we will see how the combination in Parashat Kedoshim of
obligations to God with interpersonal mitzvot represents an eternal
message of the fundamental path to true holiness.
This website is constantly being improved. We would appreciate hearing from you. Questions and comments on the classes are welcome, as is help in tagging, categorizing, and creating brief summaries of the classes. Thank you for being part of the Torat Har Etzion community!